EOB1 comparisons.

Talk about anything Legend of Grimrock 1 related here.
User avatar
Xanathar
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:19 am
Location: Torino, Italy
Contact:

Re: EOB1 comparisons.

Post by Xanathar »

All of the Illusionary walls in EOB had a rune on them indicating that there was something special about the wall.
I remember the dwarf level had quite a few unmarked illusionary walls - and really most level were full of unmarked illus. walls. There were so many almost impossible to find walls that having True Sight spell in EOB2 felt almost like cheating.

Anyway the spider level reminded me strongly of the spider level in EOB. Creepy. And Deadly.
Waking Violet (Steam, PS4, PSVita, Switch) : http://www.wakingviolet.com

The Sunset Gate [MOD]: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5563

My preciousss: http://www.moonsharp.org
DJK
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:42 am

Re: EOB1 comparisons.

Post by DJK »

dazman76 wrote:All of the Illusionary walls in EOB had a rune on them indicating that there was something special about the wall..
I didn't read the rest of the thread yet so no idea if someone else corrected this, but if not... you might have played EoB a lot (and so did I ;)) but NO, not all illusionary walls had "special runes on them".. yes some of those in the sewer levels had a marking as well as some of those on the dwarven levels... but there are a LOT of walls without any runes (which didn't bother me at all so it's not that Id want them all runed)...

I could whip up a youtube vid and showcase 10 or so sample illusionary walls without runes but I'm sure that won't be nessesary :)
User avatar
e8hffff
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 10:01 pm

Re: EOB1 comparisons.

Post by e8hffff »

The game(LoG) was clearly modelled on Dungeon Master.

I didn't play EoB at the time, as it didn’t match DM's sophistication. EoB's only attraction for me was D&D rules.
Sabatasso
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:11 pm

Re: EOB1 comparisons.

Post by Sabatasso »

e8hffff wrote:The game(LoG) was clearly modelled on Dungeon Master.

I didn't play EoB at the time, as it didn’t match DM's sophistication. EoB's only attraction for me was D&D rules.
How the heck would you know what level of "sophistication" EOB had if you didn't play it?
User avatar
Darklord
Posts: 2001
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:44 pm
Location: England

Re: EOB1 comparisons.

Post by Darklord »

I guess e8hffff read a review? :?

I feel in some ways EoB was more sophisticated., for example it has portals, a much wider variety of textures, plus way more classes. You could also find new party members in the dungeon. Just a few things of the top of my head. :)

Daniel.
A gently fried snail slice is absolutely delicious with a pat of butter...
Rob
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:33 pm

Re: EOB1 comparisons.

Post by Rob »

For me, I'd say this game is based MORE on Eye of the Beholder than on Dungeonmaster, but I suppose that can be dependant on which view you take.

I have always felt that EotB was the clear silverback of the genre though. I connected better with that than Dungeonmaster.
User avatar
marcuz99
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:36 pm
Contact:

Re: EOB1 comparisons.

Post by marcuz99 »

I never could go much far on Dungeon Master, I did found it more difficult than most dungeon crawlers, on par with the incomprehensible (for me) Abandoned Places.
But, in my humble opinion, Grimrock takes from it much of the gameplay and of the puzzle solving structure, while it takes from EoB much of its dungeon crawling feeling.
It still lacks the variety EoB had and the place it had in a larger mythos, the sophistication, as you say, but given time it has everything to become a classic game.
Post Reply